Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 So. 3d 921 - Hill v. Davis

31 So. 3d 921 - Hill v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 596 So. 2d 665 - Pardo v. State · 830 So. 2d 817 - State v. Goode · 645 So. 2d 513 - Smith v. Crawford · 351 So. 2d 32 - Alachua County v. Powers · 528 So. 2d 441 - Pontrello v. Estate of Kepler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e disagree with the sweeping holding in Angelus because it effectively renders part of section 733.212(3) meaningless. The statute clearly states that interested persons such as appellant “must object to ... the qualifications of the personal representative” within three months of the service of the notice of administration or such an objection is “forever barred.” A claim that a nonresident is not qualified to serve as a personal representative pursuant to section 733.304 is an objection to “the qualifications of the personal representative” and should be subject to the clear and unambiguous provisions of section 733.212(B).... Contrary to the Third District’s decision in Angelus , we find nothing in Florida Probate Rule 5.310 or sections 733.304 and 733.3101, Florida Statutes, which would preclude the application of the three-month statute of limitations period contained in section 733.212(3) to appellant’s claim that appellee was not qualified to serve as a nonresident personal representative pursuant to section 733.304 where the factual basis for the claim was known to appellant and could have been raised within the three-month period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.