Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 SW3D 166 - Denson v. State

Denson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc. · State v. Parker · Poe v. United States · Moss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person can lawfully use force to protect another person against an attack unless, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the person he seeks to protect would not be justified in using such force to protect himself. [Insert brief description of the basis whereby the person being protected would not be justified in using force to protect himself. See Notes on Use 3(b) for examples.] If, under the circumstances as a person reasonably believed them to be, the person he seeks to protect (was the initial aggressor (and had not withdrawn)) (was being arrested by a law enforcement officer) ([other basis for lack of justification ]), then he is not entitled to use force to protect the other person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.