Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 TC 461 - Walet v. Commissioner

Walet v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
April 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably Challenge Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner (1962), Richmond Television Corp. v. United States (1965)

7 federal appellate ·

330195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohan v. Commissioner · North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet · Illinois ex rel. Kennedy v. Hurley · Healy v. Commissioner · United States v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nor does the evidence show whether there was any proximate relationship between the expenditures and the alleged business. Certainly, the word “entertainment” is not a magic formula entitling one to deduction without inquiry as to whether the entertainment in question really had a significant bearing upon the conduct of the alleged business. The situation is one that is susceptible of gross abuse, and it is not too much to ask that one claiming such deductions show that the expenditures in question were genuinely related to the conduct of a business. We cannot say on the record before us that any of the claimed expenditures could qualify for deduction; accordingly, there is no occasion to make an approximation such as was indicated in Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F. 2d 540 (C.A. 2). * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.