Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 U.S. 102 - Lessee of Mordecai v. Peter M'Cartee

Lessee of Mordecai v. Peter M'Cartee’s Empirical Analysis

31 U.S. 102 · 1832

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Old Colony Co v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1932), Torao Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission (1948)

12 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

15018321840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Creery's v. Somerville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By tbe Judiciary Act of September 24,1789, c. 20, § 34, it was enacted ‘tbat tbe laws of tbe several states, except where tbe Constitution, treaties, or statutes of tbe United States shall otherwise require or provides shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in tbe courts of the United States in eases where they apply.’ 1 Stat. 92 . Although that section stood between two sections clearly applicable to criminal cases, it was adjudged by1 this court at December term, 1851, upon a certificate of division of opinion of the Circuit Court, directly presenting the question, that the section did not include criminal trials, or leave to the states the power to prescribe and change from time to time the rules of evidence in trials in the courts of the United States for offences against the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if. an alien cometh into England and hath issue two sons, these two sons are indígenos, subjects born, because they are born within the realm;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'The legislature must be presumed to use words in their known and ordinary signification'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.