Robert Oliver v. James Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
31 U.S. 143 · 1832
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 118 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013 · most notably Zahn v. International Paper Co. (1973), Snyder v. Harris (1969)
39 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The whole proceeding,' therefore, from the beginning to the end of the suit, though it assumes the form of a joint suit, is, in reality, a mere joinder of distinct causes of action, by distinct parties, growing out of the same contract. * * * The claim of each seaman is distinct and several; and the decree upon each claim is, in like manner, distinct and several. One seaman cannot appeal from the decree made in regard to the claim of another; for he has no interest in it, and cannot be aggrieved by it. The controversy, so far as he is concerned, is confined solely to his own claim; and the matter of dispute between him and the owners or other respondents is the sum or value of his own claim, without any reference to the claims of others.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The present is a case of seamen's wages, in which there is necessarily a several and distinct contract with each seaman, for the voyage, at his own rate of wages....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.