Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 U.S. 291 - Asa Green v. The Lessee of Henry Neal

Asa Green v. The Lessee of Henry Neal’s Empirical Analysis

31 U.S. 291 · 1832

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1978 · most notably Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. (1958), Huntington v. Attrill (1892)

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

250183218401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Polk's Lessee v. Wendal · Shelby · M'Keen v. Delancy's Lessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the case is very different where a question arises under a local law. The decision of this question, by the highest judicial tribunal of a state, should be considered as final by this court; not because the state tribunal, in such a case, has any power to bind this court; but because, in the language of the court, in the case of Shelby v. Guy, 11 Wheat. 361 , 6 L. Ed. 495 , ‘a fixed and received construction by a state in its. own .courts, makes a part of the statute law.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In a great majority of the causes brought before tho federal tribunals, they are called to enforce the laws of the states. The rights of parties are determined under those laws, and it would be a strange perversion of principle if the judicial exposition of those laws by the state tribunals should be disregarded. These expositions constitute the law, and fix the rule of property, flights are acquired under this rule, and it regulates all the transactions which come within its scope. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an adherence by the Federal courts to the exposition of the local law, as given by the courts of the State, will greatly tend to preserve harmony in the exercise of the judicial power in the State and Federal tribunals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.