Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 U.S. 515 - Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia

Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia’s Empirical Analysis

31 U.S. 515 · 1832

Citation profile

1,267
cited by 1,267 later decisions
174
cited 174 times by the Supreme Court
32
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

335 federal appellate · 159 district · 312 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,267 later decisions (174 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Baker v. Carr (1962), Morton v. Mancari (1974)

335 federal appellate · 159 district · 312 state decisions — followed in 32 states

210018321840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Gibbons v. Ogden · Cohens v. Virginia · Martin Fairfax v. Hunter's

Cited together with United States v. Kagama · Williams v. Lee · McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,267 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights”
    78 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The language used in treaties with the Indians should never be construed to their prejudice.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries, within which their authority is exclusive, and having a right to all lands within those boundaries, which is not only acknowledged, but guaranteed by the United States.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.