Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Wash. 2d 157 - Kessinger v. Anderson

31 Wash. 2d 157 - Kessinger v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably 107 Wash. 2d 388 - Willener v. Sweeting (1986), 105 Wash. 2d 551 - Emrich v. Connell (1986)

8 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

20019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To constitute estoppel in pais, three things must occur: (1) An admission, statement, or act inconsistent with the claim afterwards asserted; (2) action by the other party on the faith of such admission, statement, or act; and (3) injury to such other party resulting from allowing the first party to contradict or repudiate such admission, statement, or act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An implied waiver may arise when one party has pursued such a course of conduct as to evidence an intention to waive a right, or where his conduct is inconsistent with any other intention than to waive it.... Waiver is unilateral and arises by the intentional relinquishment of a right, or by a neglect to insist upon it....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.