31 Wash. 2d 633 - Wilson v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 114 Wash. 2d 558 - HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF EVERETT v. Terry (1990), Hwang v. McMahill (2000)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vintaloro v. Pappas · Field v. Copping, Agnew & Scales · Schultz v. Cardwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen he or she continues in possession . . . after a default in the payment of rent, and after notice in writing requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of the detained premises. . . . [and the request] has remained uncomplied with for the period of three days after service thereof. The notice may be served at any time after the rent becomes due.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The payment of rent merely gives the tenant the right of possession of the premises during the term, but it does not, during that term, give him the right to violate other provisions of the lease. Although the acceptance of rent waives the right to declare a forfeiture for prior breaches, it does not operate as a waiver of a continuance of the breaches or of any subsequent breaches.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By reason of provisions designed to hasten the recovery of possession, the statutes creating it remove the necessity to which the landlord was subjected at common law, [sic] of bringing an action of ejectment [under RCW 7.28] with its attendant delays and expenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.