Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Wash. App. 198 - State v. Maffeo

31 Wash. App. 198 - State v. Maffeo’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2003

14 state decisions

80198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · 95 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Seagull · 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin · United States v. Valenzuela

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n Smith the police had no direct contact with the third party. Thus, they had to depend entirely upon the unproven informant’s version of what she had been told by the third party. There was simply no corroboration of this story which could have been a complete fabrication. In contrast with Smith , Deputy Reese was dealing directly with Martin and Robinson. Viewing them as informants, their statements are surrounded by indi-cia of reliability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “draw reasonable inferences from the facts and circumstances set forth in the supporting affidavit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.