Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Wash. App. 304 - State v. Jessup

31 Wash. App. 304 - State v. Jessup’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
9
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 79 Wash. App. 786 - State v. Rundquist (1995), 35 Cal. 4th 1 - People v. Carson (2005)

48 state decisions

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Russell · Mancusi v. DeForte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant was made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, is mentally competent and alert, yet insists on proceeding pro se, the defendant has acted knowingly. A showing of technical legal knowledge is not required. . . . ... A right is exercised "knowingly" if it is asserted willfully and intentionally. State v. Robbins, 15 Wn. App. 108 , 547 P.2d 288 (1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if it is asserted willfully and intentionally. State v. Robbins, 15 Wn. App. 108 , 547 P.2d 288 (1976). State v. Jessup, 31 Wn. App. 304, 310-11 , 641 P.2d 1185 (1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “conduct designed to institute, aid, or facilitate an act or enterprise of prostitution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.