Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Wash. App. 41 - State v. Mason

31 Wash. App. 41 - State v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2021

14 state decisions

4019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · Rhode Island v. Innis · Brewer v. Williams · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The admissibility of a confession obtained after the assertion of Miranda rights depends on whether the request was “scrupulously honored.” [Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104 ]; State v. Boggs, 16 Wn. App. 682 , 559 P.2d 11 [, review denied, 88 Wn.2d 1017 ] (1977). A per se prohibition of any further interrogation, once an accused has asserted his right to counsel, has been rejected in this state. Further questioning of a suspect is allowed provided the following conditions exist: (1) the right to cut off questioning was scrupulously honored; (2) the police engaged in no further words or actions amounting to interrogation before obtaining a waiver or assuring the presence of an attorney; (3) the police engaged in no tactics which tend to coerce the suspect; and (4) the subsequent waiver was knowing and voluntary. State v. Pierce, 94 Wn.2d 345 , 618 P.2d 62 (1980)[, overruled in part on other grounds by Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482 , 101 S. Ct. 1880 , 68 L. Ed. 2d 378 (1981) (addressing whether law enforcement officers can recontact a defendant after that defendant has asserted his or her right to counsel)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]efendant's involuntary detention at [a juvenile detention facility] did not make it his home as contemplated by Payton”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when that element of the crime charged provides merely the degree of the generic crime charged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.