31 Wash. App. 809 - State v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2012
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · 21 Wash. App. 354 - State v. Fritz · 60 Wash. 2d 836 - Gardner v. Malone · State v. Gay · 90 Wash. 2d 657 - State v. Charlton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]ublic policy forbids inquiries into the privacy of the jury's deliberations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A pro se defendant must bear the consequences of his or her own representation and cannot on appeal complain of the quality of the defense. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he effect of a juror's illness and the claimed pressure by others inheres in the verdict and may not be used to impeach the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reynoldson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.