Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 A.2d 229 - Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2015

23 state decisions

12019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alabama State Federation of Labor Local v. McAdory · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · New York Stock Exchange v. Legate · Oliver v. United States · Linus Pauling v. James O. Eastland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the ultimate question depends on contingencies which may not come about, that question is not ripe for judicial resolution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “when the parties' rights may be immediately affected by ... a judicial decision [resolving it].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.