Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 A2D 247 - Vicks v. United States

Vicks v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2001

1 district · 7 state decisions

301973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Peterkin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognized that [Peterkin ] presented a borderline situation but held that the two-way exchange tipped the scale from innocent activity to illicit bargaining. Here, of course, there was no ‘two-way exchange’ and no ‘plain view' of the [evidence]. Thus, there existed no probable cause to arrest appellant and seize the handkerchief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.