Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 Ark. 571 - Ray v. Green

Ray v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Long v. Lampton (1996), Dovers v. Stephenson Oil Co., Inc. (2003)

26 state decisions

160199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calder v. Job · Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Wallace · Clayton v. Wagnon · Pineview Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore, Inc. · Blissett v. Frisby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When acting upon a motion for new trial challenging a jury’s verdict, the trial court is required by Ark. R. Civ. P. 59(a)(6) to set aside the verdict if it is clearly against the preponderance of the evidence or contrary to the law. Dedman v. Porch, 293 Ark. 571 , 739 S.W.2d 685 (1987). The test on review, where the motion is denied, is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence. Schaeffer v. McGhee, 286 Ark. 113 , 689 S.W.2d 537 (1985). It is only where there is no reasonable probability that the incident occurred according to the version of the prevailing party or where fair-minded men can only draw a contrary conclusion that a jury verdict should be disturbed. Blissett v. Frisby, 249 Ark. 235 , 458 S.W.2d 735 (1970). (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.