In Re Houston’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 2006
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Beezley v. California Land Title Co. · Judd v. Wolfe · Madaj v. K Madaj a · Keenom v. All American Marketing (In Re Keenom) · Matter of James
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.