In Re Fonke’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983)
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant · In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos Soto · In the Matter of Daniel J Yonikus and Carolyn S Yonikuss Appeal of Daniel J Yonikus · 18 477 72162 Chaffin Chaffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the...Debtor's bankruptcy was motivated solely by the two-party dispute with [the creditor], and was essentially an attempt to thwart [the creditor] in the State Court Litigation and to engage in forum shopping,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.