Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 F.2d 127

Docket No. 19431.

Bernes v. Henning

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-11-23

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1970

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on King v. Heard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-11-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Harold H. Clokey, Jr., Hugh A. Wells, Atlanta, Ga., Schell, Kaye & Nodvin, Arnold S. Kaye, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants. John M. Sikes, Jr., H. Fred Gober, Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

It appearing that the only issue here is one of fact, and it appearing that this Court cannot determine that the judgment of the trial court, approving the findings of the special master, was clearly erroneous, the judgment is

¶2

Affirmed.

/310/f2d/127 · .json · Public domain