Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 F.2d 128

Docket No. 117.

Docket Docket 27724.

Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued November 15, 1962.

Decided November 15, 1962.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-11-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1962

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Samuel Dinerman, Petitioning Creditor v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., Alleged Bankrupt

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Irving P. Dinerman, New York City (Dinerman & Klatzke, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Charles Sutton, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Bonom & Wolfson, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We affirm in open court the order of the district court which directed the Lincoln Savings Bank to pay to the appellee the sum of $816.65 which it holds on deposit in the name of the appellant, in satisfaction of a judgment against him. The judgment, representing costs and disbursements, arose out of the previous appeal to this court which was determined adversely to the appellant in Dinerman v. Bowley & Travers, Inc., 301 F.2d 464 (2 Cir., 1962).

/310/f2d/128 · .json · Public domain