Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 206 - States Marine Corporation of Delaware, a Corporation v. Producers Cooperative Packing Co., Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Springbrook Packing Company, Winndixie Tampa Inc., and Stanislaus Food Products Co., States Marine Corporation of Delaware, a Corporation v. California Packing Corporation, Hollister Canning Company, Hunt Foods, Inc., Richmond-Chase Growers, Inc.

States Marine Corporation of Delaware, a Corporation v. Producers Cooperative Packing Co., Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Springbrook Packing Company, Winndixie Tampa Inc., and Stanislaus Food Products Co., States Marine Corporation of Delaware, a Corporation v. California Packing Corporation, Hollister Canning Company, Hunt Foods, Inc., Richmond-Chase Growers, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 206 · 1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
December 1994
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1994

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McAllister v. United States · Schneiderman v. United States · In Re Disbarment of Isserman · Baumgartner v. United States · Schnell v. The Vallescura

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'bring himself within the exception Or to show that he has not been negligent.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.