Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 341 - United States v. Aarons

United States v. Aarons’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 341 · 1962

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. Freeman (1964), 280 F. Supp. 938 - Landry v. Daley (1968)

39 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

2601962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 14 U.S.C. § 1 (Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2006) · 44 U.S.C. § 302 · 44 U.S.C. § 305 · 44 U.S.C. § 307 · 50 U.S.C. § 191 (§ 1 of the Espionage Act of 1917) · 50 U.S.C. § 192 (§ 2 of the Espionage Act of 1917) · 50 U.S.C. § 797 · 5 U.S.C. § 1001

Relies on Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · American Communications Ass'n v. Douds · Poulos v. State of New Hampshire · Achilli v. United States · Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 1505. Documents to be published in Federal Register (a) Proclamations and Executive Orders; documents having general applicability and legal effect; documents required to be published by Congress. There shall be published in the Federal Register— (1) Presidential proclamations and Executive orders, except those not having general applicability and legal effect or effective only against' Federal agencies or persons in their capacity as officers, agents, or employees thereof; (2) documents or classes. of documents that the President may determine from time to time have general applicability and legal effect; and (3) documents or classes of documents that may be required so to be published by Act of Congress. For the purposes of this chapter every document or order which prescribes a penalty has general applicability and legal effect. (b) Documents authorized to be published by regulations; comments and news items excluded. In addition to the foregoing there shall also be published in the Federal Register other documents or classes of documents authorized to be published by regulations prescribed under this chapter with the approval of the President, but comments or news items of any character may not be published in the Federal Register.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A document required by section 1505(a) of this title to be published in the Federal Register is not valid as against a person who has not had actual knowledge of it until the duplicate originals or certified copies of the document have been filed with the Office of the Federal Register and a copy made available for public inspecton as provided by section 1503 of this title. Unless otherwise specifically provided by statute, filing of a document, required or authorized to be published by section 1505 of this title, except in cases where notice by publication is insufficient in law, is sufficient to give notice of the contents of the documents to a person subject to or affected by it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Since the [APA] leaves wide latitude for each agency to frame its own procedures, this subsection requiring agencies to state their organization and procedures in the form of rules is essential for the information of the public. The publication must be kept up to date. The enumerated classes of informational rules must also be separately stated so that, for example, rules of procedure will be separate from rules of substance, interpretation or policy.... The requirement that no one shall ‘in any manner' be required to resort to unpublished organization or procedure protects the public from being required to pursue remedies that are not generally known.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.