United States v. Nicoletti’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.2d 359 · 1962
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 1998 · most notably United States v. Chapin (1975), United States v. Sweig (1971)
29 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621
Relies on American Communications Ass'n v. Douds · United States v. Debrow · Weiler v. United States · Hammer v. United States · United States v. Accardo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think, however, that strong and convincing circumstantial evidence may prove the intent to falsify just as circumstantial evidence can be used in other criminal cases to establish guilt of an accused beyond a reasonable doubt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the ordinary perjury prosecution ... the false statement is not a statement of belief, but rather, a false statement of some objective fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.