Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 367 - United States v. Duncan

United States v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 367 · 1962

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
July 1988
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113

Relies on Boykin v. Huff · Riffle v. United States · Ong v. Hunter · Valdez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A letter written by an indigent prisoner within the time for appeal informing the trial court of a desire to appeal may be regarded as sufficient to constitute the taking of an appeal .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.