Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 45 - United States v. Bowen

United States v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 45 · 1962

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2004

15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

10019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. Ispass · United States v. Bowen · Tucker Products Corp. v. Helms · New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. A. Cimpi Express Lines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “preoccupation of counsel with other matters does not dispense with the necessity for a compliance with the rules”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.