Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.2d 618 · 1962
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2005
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co. · National Mutual Ins. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. · Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Larry Shaw, a Minor by H. L. Shaw, Next Friend, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. J. H. Carson and C. M. Miller · Chesher v. United States Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) a trailer while used with any motor vehicle owned or hired by such person or organization and not covered by like insurance in the company.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Drake paid no rental or other compensation for the use of the trailer. On the contrary, as we have seen, he exacted a higher price for the use of his tractor than he ordinarily charged for his complete tractor-trailer outfit. There was no hiring on Drake’s part. The contract merely provided that Drake, for an agreed price, would furnish his tractor and a driver to haul Carolina’s loaded trailer... and return the trailer to its owner. Id. at 620-21 (Citation omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fisher v. Tyler · Fisher v. Tyler““It is obviously the purpose of the ordinary substitute clause to cover an automobile temporarily used to the same extent as the automobile described in the policy but not to give the substitute automobile a wider coverage.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.