Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 631 - Hilliard v. United States

Hilliard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 631 · 1962

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 1986
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 1986

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008) · 26 U.S.C. § 6013

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Helvering v. Bliss · McFeely v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a statute is unambiguous, it should be given effect according to its literal language.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.