Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 632 - Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Fusco

Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Fusco’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 632 · 1962

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (2002), Hamlin Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission (1964)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

160196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Bell v. Hood · Leedom v. Kyne · American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board · Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Virginian Ry Co v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By its complaint in this case, Eastern seeks to have the District Court review and set aside the NLRB determination that its dispatchers are not within the meaning of § 2 of the NLRA (§ 152(11), Title 29 U. S.C.A.). It contends that the Board erred in its weighing of the evidence relevant to the issue presented and arrived at erroneous factual conclusions. Under applicable decisions, it seems now to be clear that unless the Board’s action is so patently without legality as was the case in Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 , the route of review of a certification order of the Board is through Sections 9(d) and 10(e) of the Act (§§ 159 (d) and 160(e), Title 29 U.S.C.A.) whereby an employer or a union may, by resistance to an unfair labor charge, obtain a review of such certification.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he issuance of an injunction pending appeal is a matter within our discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.