Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.2d 803 - Oughton v. United States

Oughton v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.2d 803 · 1962

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Bennett v. Passic (1976), Stiltner v. Rhay (1963)

30 federal appellate · 4 district ·

190196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Reddish · Machibroda v. United States · Gideon v. Cochran · Ragan v. Cox · Barrett v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f an application to proceed in forma pauperis is supported by papers satisfying the requirements of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (a) leave to proceed should be granted, and then, if the court discovers that the action is frivolous or improper or that the allegations of poverty are untrue, it can dismiss the proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (d).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a district court receives an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, it should examine the papers and determine if the requirements of § 1915(a) are satisfied. If they are, leave should be granted. Thereafter, if the court finds that the allegations of poverty are untrue or that the action is frivolous or malicious, it may dismiss the case but in so doing it should clearly state the grounds for such action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.