Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 F.2d 883

Docket No. 150, Docket 27588.

United States v. Gaydos

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 29, 1962. Decided Nov. 29, 1962.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-11-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1965

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Allen S. Stim, New York City, (Menahem Stim and Paul J. Curran, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

John S. Martin, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, (Vincent L. Broderick, U.S. Atty., and Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before CLARK, MOORE, and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The evidence was quite clear that defendant, while not a big operator, did accept bets on horse races from his associates to be placed with a 'bookie'; and the verdict of conviction was therefore justified. The charge was exemplary; of course the judge was not obligated to charge in appellant's requested language. The rulings on evidence to which exception was taken were well within the court's discretion. The decision is affirmed in open court.

¶2

Affirmed.

/310/f2d/883 · .json · Public domain