United States v. Waldman’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 1074 · 2002
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Mashek (2005), United States v. Spencer (2010)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holloway v. United States · Cross v. Cleaver · United States v. Boyd · United States v. Beck · United States v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The sentencing judge is in a unique position to evaluate a defendant's acceptance of responsibility[, and] the determination of the sentencing judge is entitled to great deference on review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.