Bowman v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 1080 · 2002
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Kelley v. Callahan · Jerold H. Nevland v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Cox v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, the review we undertake is more than an examination of the record for the existence of substantial evidence in support of the Commissioner's decision[;] we also take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from that decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“prior work history; daily activities; duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; dosage, effectiveness and side effects of medications; precipitating and aggravating factors; and functional restrictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the management of moderate to severe pain when a continuous, around the clock analgesic is needed for an extended period of time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.