United States v. Oleson’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 1085 · 2002
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Gooden · United States v. Gonzales · United States v. Jacobs · United States v. Schubel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[] In order to sustain a conviction, there must be evidence that Oleson was an unlawful user of or addicted to controlled substances during the same period of time that he possessed firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(3); United States v. McIntosh, 23 F.3d 1454 , 1458 (8th Cir.1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The test for harmless error is whether the erroneous evidentiary ruling had a substantial influence on the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.