Rosie D. ex rel. John v. Swift’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 230 · 2002
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Redondo-Borges v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (2005), Espinal-Dominguez v. Puerto Rico (2003)
18 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Quern v. Jordan · Maine v. Thiboutot · Rosado v. Wyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]uch other necessary health care, diagnostic services, treatment and other measures described [as medical assistance] to correct or ameliorate defects and physical and mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the State plan.” Id. § 1396d(r)(5). In effect, these amendments required states to provide Medicaid coverage for any service”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provide for granting an opportunity for a fair hearing before the State agency to any individual whose claim for medical assistance under the plan is denied or is not acted upon with reasonable promptness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.