Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.3d 25 - Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.

Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.3d 25 · 2002

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc. (2003), John G. Danielson, Inc. v. Winchester-Conant Properties, Inc. (2003)

9 federal appellate · 11 district ·

130200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 504 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 507 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp. · Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder · Data General Corporation v. Grumman Systems Support Corporation · Hamil America, Inc. v. GFI · Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Bruce almost surely would not have been able to negotiate with World News for anything other than a single, lump-sum, up-front licensing fee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.