Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.3d 39 - Mateo v. United States

Mateo v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.3d 39 · 2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · New York v. Belton · Hill v. United States · Custis v. United States · Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he main holding in Mateo I does not apply because the state court order now is part of the record. As for the further comment quoted above — that Mateo would not be advantaged even had we considered the nunc pro tunc order — we think this meant only that the district court had not erred as the record before it stood; the court in Mateo I should not be taken to have decided in a brief comment a very difficult set of substantive issues concerning the consequence of a post-sentencing vacation of a state sentence that affected the federal sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the soundness of the procedural ruling is debatable, and . . . [that] the [underlying] constitutional claim is also colorable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “reflects the same impulse as Slack to protect nascent constitutional claims”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.