Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 F.3d 529 - Jones v. Infocure Corp.

Jones v. Infocure Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

310 F.3d 529 · 2002

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

30 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Kilburn v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (2004), Jamie S. v. Milwaukee Public Schools (2012)

30 federal appellate ·

290200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · Clinton v. Jones · Bobby J. Anderson v. Alfred Hardman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the preliminary injunction is not sufficiently closely related to the transfer order to warrant the exercise of pendent appellate jurisdiction ... The two issues can be resolved without reference to each other.”) 23 . Ukiah, 981 F.2d at 548 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “given the language of 28 U.S.C. § 1294 [,] it is doubtful that the court of appeals in the transferee area could exercise jurisdiction over an appealable interlocutory order entered by a district court outside its region”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to review an otherwise unappealable interlocutory order if it is inextricably intertwined with an appealable one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.