United States v. Kehoe’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 579 · 2002
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably 34 Cal. 4th 821 - People v. Combs (2004), United States v. Sabhnani (2010)
37 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1959 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3593 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Blockburger v. United States · Bruton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To show a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause, a defendant must prove that the offenses for which he is prosecuted and punished are the same offense in both law and fact. [Bennett, 44 F.3d at 1368 ] (citation omitted). Offenses are not considered the “same,” if “each of the offenses ... requires proof of a different element.” Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932); United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688, 696-97 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.