Chavez v. Cockrell’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 805 · 2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Teague v. Lane · Lindh v. Murphy · Smith v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A stun belt, also known as a security belt, delivers a 50,000 volt electrical shock to the wearer when activated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.