United States v. Tadros’s Empirical Analysis
310 F.3d 999 · 2002
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Paladino (2005), Carnegie v. Household International, Inc. (2004)
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Schmuck v. United States · Crivens v. Roth · United States v. Dimas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] violation of the Brady rule occurs only when the government withholds evidence which, had it been disclosed, creates a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the five-year statute of limitations begins to run from the date of mailing of the fraudulent information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.