¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Percy J. Cheatham, Jr., in the appeal of the denial of his motion to modify his sentence has moved for leave to withdraw *689 and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cheat-ham has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
310 F. App'x 688
United States v. Cheatham
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 18, 2009
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-02-18
Relies on Anders v. California
Decided 2009-02-18