United States v. Mendez

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2009

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-02-18

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States of America v. Mitchell Ray Daugherty · United States v. Rawls

Decided 2009-02-18

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 *712 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Mendez, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-44 (5th Cir.1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *712 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.