United States v. Harris

¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Lee Harris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. *717 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Harris’s outstanding pro se motions are DENIED. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.