Meade v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The leading case on standing is Jones v. United States [ 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 ], supra. Jones held the defendant in that case had standing in one of two ways. First, if possession both convicts and confers standing, standing is automatically conferred. . . . Secondly, anyone legitimately on the premises where a search occurs may challenge the legality of the search and seizure. Jones further held that 'this would of course not avail those who by virtue of their wrongful presence, cannot invoke the privacy of the premises searched.’ 362 U.S. at 267 , 80 S.Ct. at 734 , 4 L.Ed.2d at 706 .””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 48 Ala. App. 217 - Hodges v. State · 27 Md. App. 302 - Duncan and Smith v. State

2. ““In the present case, the court refuses to allow petitioner standing to challenge the search of an automobile, which petitioner was in possession of only by reason of the murder he committed.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bodde v. State