Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 FSUPP 35 - Lemon v. Kurtzman

Lemon v. Kurtzman’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
February 1977
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flast v. Cohen · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority · School District of Abington Township Pennsylvania v. Schempp J Murray III · Everson v. Board of Education · Cooper v. Aaron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t is reasonable to anticipate continuing political controversy in every state and local community whether and to what extent public funds are to be granted to subsidize a large number and a broad range of activities of religious organizations. Leaders and devout members of various organized religious groups will see it as their duty to their church or sect to seek such aid and to insist that state and local government contribute liberally to their sectarian enterprises. Legislators, government executives and candidates for elective office in whose judgment other claims upon the public purse merit higher priority can anticipate political opposition as enemies of the faith. In this way religion and polities will become in pari materia”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.