Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 FSUPP 600 - Ramsey v. Ciccone

Ramsey v. Ciccone’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 1991

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

210197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Avery · Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. · Jackson v. Bishop · Harris v. Settle · 226 F. Supp. 304 - Austin v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The failure to provide needed medical treatment resulting from simple negligence is not a violation of the 8th amendment or any other provision of the Constitution of the United States, because there is no constitutional guaranty that prisoners shall not be injured as a result of simple negligence. Injury to a prisoner from simple negligence is an apparently unavoidable frequent occurrence of life, which is not considered cruel and unusual punishment. Such an injury is, however, a tort and remediable as such under applicable tort law.” Ramsey v. Ciccone, supra, at 605.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “according of [time] to some and denial to others could not in any way constitute a denial of equal treatment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.