Rushing v. Finch’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““After carefully considering the entire record, the undersigned finds and concludes that there is no new and material evidence probative of the issue of disability on or before September 30, 1970, the day claimant was last insured insured for disability insurance benefits, and that therefore the current application and requests for hearing involves the rights of the same party on the same facts and issues as the prior decision of the Secretary issued on October 30, 1970, which is final and binding on the claimant. Accordingly, claimant’s request for hearing filed on July 31, 1972, is hereby dismissed as to all issues, under authority of Section 404.-937(a) of the Social Security Regulations. The determinations of the Administration remain in full force and effect.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 369 F. Supp. 127 - Cole v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

2. ““To allow relitigation of plaintiff’s claim after his failing to obtain court review under the procedures and within the time limits provided by law would run counter to the purposes and intent of the Social Security Act. Hobby v. Hodges, 215 F.2d 754 (10th Cir. 1954); Cf. S. E. C. v. La. Public Service Commission, 353 U.S. 368 , 77 S.Ct. 855 , 1 L.Ed.2d 897 (1957).” Rushing v. Finch, 310 F.Supp. 848 (W.D.La.1970).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 369 F. Supp. 127 - Cole v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare