Cobell v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Berger v. United States · In Re Peterson · United States v. Haldeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“documentation obtained outside of normal channels and to [sic] which the parties may have no familiarity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in any proceeding in which [a judge's] impartiality might reasonably be questioned”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.