Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Papasan v. Allain · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“special circumstance” where the Court may raise it sua sponte. Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 394-95 , 120 S.Ct. 2304 , 147 L.Ed.2d 374 (2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.