310 F. Supp. 2d 884 - Roudnahal v. Ridge’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 44 U.S.C. § 1507 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 263 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1305 (§ 265 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Papasan v. Allain · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · United States v. Mitchell · Vandygriff v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“aliens of any other class not lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kandamar v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.